Legal Opinion
(PC)Wright v. Rodriguez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01586Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, No. 1:23-cv-01586 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. ORDER RECOMMENDING: 14 RODRIGUEZ, et al., (1) PLAINTIFF BE DECLARED A THREE 15 Defendants. STRIKES LITIGANT WITHIN THE MEANING OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 16 (2) PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 STATUS BE REVOKED 18 (3) THE PENDING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE 19 DENIED, AND 20 (4) PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO PAY FILING FEE IN FULL PRIOR TO 21 PROCEEDING ANY FURTHER WITH THIS ACTION 22 (ECF…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ricky Ashley v. E. Dilworth, Co-1, Maximum Security UnitCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.