Legal Opinion

Check-Mate Industries, Inc. v. Say Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for the specific performance of an option to purchase real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J), dated December 13, 1990, as, after a hearing, denied it an award of attorneys’ fees.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff in this case was granted specific performance against the defendant in connection with an option to purchase the defendant’s building, and that determination was affirmed by this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park South Associates v. EssebagNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Check-Mate Industries, Inc. v. Say AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Park South Associates v. EssebagCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  4. Huling v. CoppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API