Legal Opinion
Park South Associates v. Essebag
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered May 20, 1982 affirmed, with $10 costs.
Landlord commenced a holdover summary proceeding in January 1982, asserting tenant was operating a business out of her residential apartment. Tenant moved to dismiss the petition, on the ground that the notice to cure was defective and void, being a five-day notice when the appropriate provision of the Code of the Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc. (§ 53) required 10 days’ notice. At the conclusion of the affidavit in support of tenant’s motion, counsel requested an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees.
*995Ci…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Harradine v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- United Pickle Co. v. OmanoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- N. V. Madison, Inc. v. SaurweinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
4Cited by10 opinions
- Centennial Restorations Co. v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- 650 Park Avenue Corp. v. McRaeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Scotia Associates v. BondCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Mellon v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- CFJ Associates of New York, Inc. v. Hanson IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.