Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1962 Ford Thunderbird
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 20, 1964No. 64 C 396PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILL, District Judge.
This is a proceeding instituted by a libel seeking forfeiture of the vehicle-defendant pursuant to the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 782, which provides in relevant part as follows:
“Any vessel, vehicle, or aircraft which has been or is being used in violation of any provision of section 781 of this title, or in, upon, or by means of which any violation of said section has taken or is taking place, shall be seized and forfeited: Provided, That no vessel, vehicle,- or aircraft used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as such common carrier shall be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. OshkoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. One 1971 Mercedes Benz 2-Door Coupe, Serial No. 11304412023280Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- United States v. One 1971 Porsche Coupe Automobile, Vehicle Identification Number 9111100355District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Harold Wellington Rapp, Harold Wellington Rapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.