Legal Opinion

Tate v. City of Malden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 27, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The defendants appeal from a final decree adjudging to be null and void the taking by eminent domain by the city of Malden of five parcels of land on Middlesex Street, owned by the plaintiffs at the time of the taking, for the purpose of constructing a public parking place.

The decree was erroneous. We hold, contrary to the ruling of the judge in the Superior Court, that the special statute under which the city acted (St. 1954, c. 600) did authorize the taking of the plaintiffs’ land, even though it was at the time being used for public parking.

The statute provides in part, “For the purpose of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Poole v. City of KankakeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Cary Library v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Luke v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Cabot v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Pierce v. Town of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Court Street Parking Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Ballantine v. Town of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API