Legal Opinion

State v. Hendrix

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1985No. 13912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Following jury trial defendant was convicted of assault in the first degree and sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. At trial, defendant primarily relied on self-defense and the jury was instructed on that defense by MAI-CR2d 2.41.1. He presents three points on appeal.

In one of his points appellant contends that the court erred in failing to give MAI-CR2d 2.50 regarding character evidence because there was evidence of defendant’s character relevant to the offense charged. That instruction is set forth below.1

Note 1 of the notes on use following MAI-CR2d 2.50 states:

“1.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. State v. SiemsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Bond v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BolenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. SimsTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. ZamoraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API