State v. Siems

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction by jury of the offense of sodomy in violation of § 563.230 RSMo 1969. On appeal, defendant raises four points of alleged error, all of which are stated in the abstract, do not state why they are erroneous and thereby fail to comport with the requirements of Rule 84.04. But, nevertheless, we are compelled to reverse and remand the case for a new trial.

The facts, as presented through the prosecuting witnesses, are sufficiently facino-rous. The victim, a 12 year old girl, testified that at the defendant’s urging, she had placed her mouth on…