State v. Shulark

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

The state petitions this court to review a memorandum decision of the court of ap peals that vacated the defendant’s sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

II. ISSUE

We address only one question on review: whether defendant’s two acts of forgery were committed on the “same occasion” for purposes of sentence enhancement.

III. PACTS

The following facts are necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal. The defendant and two women, Patty Clark and another woman, devised a forging and cashing scheme for a…