State v. Henry
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
David Henry was convicted of recklessly trafficking in stolen property, a class 3 felony. 1 Because Henry was a prior offender on parole, his sentence was enhanced under A.R.S. § 13-604 and was imposed consecutively to his existing sentences. Henry claims the enhanced sentence violates A.R.S. § 13-604(H), which restricts enhancement based on multiple convictions for criminal acts occurring on the “same occasion.” We granted review to continue our examination of the applicability of A.R.S. § 13-604 in various situations. See, e.g., State v. Noble, 152 Ariz. 284, 731…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MulalleyArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DerelloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RasulCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. BedoniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.