Legal Opinion

State v. Henry

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1987No. CR-86-0003-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

David Henry was convicted of recklessly trafficking in stolen property, a class 3 felony. 1 Because Henry was a prior offender on parole, his sentence was enhanced under A.R.S. § 13-604 and was imposed consecutively to his existing sentences. Henry claims the enhanced sentence violates A.R.S. § 13-604(H), which restricts enhancement based on multiple convictions for criminal acts occurring on the “same occasion.” We granted review to continue our examination of the applicability of A.R.S. § 13-604 in various situations. See, e.g., State v. Noble, 152 Ariz. 284, 731…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. MulalleyArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DerelloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. State v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. RasulCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. BedoniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API