Legal Opinion

Bowersock v. Wickery

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1900No. 11541PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; W. T. McBride, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

' Doster, C. J. :

The controversy in this case arose upon a motion filed by Samuel Wickery to vacate an entry of satisfaction of a judgment which had been recovered for his use and benefit by one T. M. Adams against J. D. Bowersock. The entry of satisfaction was vacated and Bowersock has prosecuted error to this court.

Wickery had recovered a judgment against one Tisdale. Execution was issued on the judgment and placed in the hands of Adams, as sheriff, who levied it on certain personal property of Tisdale’s. Bower-sock, claiming to be the owner of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. BlakemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carrigg v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Cooper v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API