Legal Opinion

Robertet Flavors, Inc. v. Tri-Form Construction Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 2010No. A-70/A-71 September Term 2008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

Commercial construction projects often present unique challenges to the courts, in part because when an argument erupts over a claimed construction defect, it is inevitably complicated by the conflicting interests of the parties. The project owner wants the building to be free of defects, while other parties to the project, including the general contractor, its subcontractors and suppliers, the construction manager, if any, the architect and other design professionals, each may dispute the existence of, the extent of, and the responsibility for, any claimed defects. Moreover, each of them may…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Zaccardi v. BeckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kimberlee Williams v. BASF Catalysts LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Kent Motor Cars, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds, Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. BUILD. MATERIALS v. Allstate Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. Miller v. LankowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API