Legal Opinion

N.H. v. T.A.P.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 9, 2007No. 2050908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Judge.

T.A.P. sued N.H. (“the mother”) in July 2005, asserting that he was the biological father of T.A.P., Jr. (“the child”), alleging that the child was dependent, and seeking custody of the child.

At trial T.A.P. admitted that his initial allegation that the mother had denied the child medical care was not true. T.A.P. also stated that he felt it would be in the best interests of the child for the child to be placed into his custody. T.A.P. made no effort to prove that the child was dependent. Although T.A.P.’s initial complaint did not request child support, T.A.P. stated at trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. K.L.U. v. M.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. Thomas v. VanhornCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberson v. C.P. Allen Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Kelly v. KellyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  3. Kelly v. KellyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  4. Nh v. TapCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API