Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Hutchins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1963No. 666PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

“It is weld established in this jurisdiction that where a husband and wife enter into -a separation -agreement and thereafter become reconciled and renew their marital relations, the agreement is terminated for every pmpo.se in so- far as if remains executory. (Citations) . Even ¡so, a -reconciliation and resumption of marital relations by the parties to' .a separation agreement would not revoke or -invalidate a duly executed deed of conveyance in .a property settlement between the parties.” Jones v. Lewis, 243 N.C. 259, 261, 90 S.E. 2d 547, and cases cited; Harrell v. Powell, 251 N.C. 636,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanley v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Peel v. . CalaisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of AdameeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Tilley v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Bass v. Mooresville MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Council v. PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API