Castro v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm appellant’s three convictions under section 316.193(3)(c)l, Florida Statutes (1993). State v. Salazar, 679 So.2d 1183, (Fla. 1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, (Fla. 1996). We reverse that portion of the written order' of probation which indicates that appellant may perform community service in lieu of costs of supervision. E.g., Royster v. State, 657 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the entry of an amended order of probation.
GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Melbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Royster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. SalazarSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phillips v. General Acc. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996