Legal Opinion

State v. Salazar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 26, 1996No. 87010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Salazar v. State, 665 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified conflict with State v.

Lamoureux, 660 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash Salazar based on Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996). Melbourne applies to parts 1, 2, and 3 of section 316.193(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1993).

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Melbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. LamoureuxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Salazar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996