Legal Opinion

United States v. Jon Fielding Yost

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 2007No. 06-10911PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

Jon Fielding Yost appeals his convictions of two counts of using the Internet to knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice or coerce a minor to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Yost argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to prove he attempted to commit the charged crimes. Specifically, Yost claims the Government failed to show both that he had the requisite intent to commit the crimes and that he committed a substantial step in furtherance of the underlying crimes. We affirm.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On July 19, 2005, a federal grand jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony F. MurrellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Robert Owen BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. John Allen RootCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Hazel Lyons, Judith Price, Terry Reese, A/K/A Terrance Towns, Angela ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. BelfastCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. RothenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API