Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1958No. Civ. 22625PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
This appeal is companion to Campbell v. Clark (No. 22624), ante, p. 432 [324 P.2d 51], The judgment here under review likewise followed rulings which sustained defendants’ objection to the introduction of any evidence and denied plaintiff’s request for leave to amend her complaint. The record discloses that defendants filed a general demurrer to the complaint, but it was stricken by the judge presiding in the law and motion department on the ground that its filing was “not timely.”
It is unnecessary to repeat here the general rules of law governing our review of this judgment and the rulings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Thomas v. BruzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hagan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Shaw v. Empire Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Smith v. Tele-Communication, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. ClausonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.