Legal Opinion
Bertelstein v. Marks
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1937No. 1452PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
Plaintiff, asserting that she was a passenger for a consideration in the automobile of defendant Reuben Marks, instituted action against him, charged that she was injured by che carelessuess and negligence of Marks in the operation of the car and secured a default judgment of $2500.00. Marks was insured with the defendant, The Travelers Indemnity Company.
The company with notice of the facts respecting the collision out of which the action grew, refused to defend the suit. The judgment against Marks being unpaid, supplemental action was instituted against the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beatty v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Cartos v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Marks v. Home Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Commercial Union Assur. Co. of London v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Wood v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Voelkl v. Latin, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
- Pierson v. White Pine Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022