Legal Opinion

Packaging Acquisition Corp. v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 7, 2004No. 1030148PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYONS, Justice.

Packaging Acquisition Corporation (“PAC”) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its counterclaim against Dennis Hicks, Gus King, Roy Burchel, PacMas-ters, Inc., AMCOPAC, Inc., and Colormas-ters LLC (“the sellers”). We reverse and remand.

In May 2000, PAC, a Georgia corporation engaged in the business of flexible packaging, purchased the sellers’ business, AMPAC, Inc., also engaged in flexible packaging, and the assets of the business. The sellers and two acquisition companies, Printmasters Acquisition Corporation and AMPAC Acquisition Corporation, executed the purchase…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte CTB, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. AC, INC. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Julia M. Smith v. Nat. SEC. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Medical Ass'n of State v. ShoemakeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin K. Berks Environmental Attorneys Group, LLC, and Environmental Attorneys Group,P.C. v. Gregory A. CadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  2. Martin K. Berks Environmental Attorneys Group, LLC, and Environmental Attorneys Group,P.C. v. Gregory A. CadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API