Legal Opinion

United States v. Theodore Edmonds

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 4, 1996No. 93-1890PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

A federal jury convicted appellant Theodore Edmonds of violating the Continuing Criminal Enterprise statute (“CCE”), 21 U.S.C. § 848, which makes it a crime to organize, supervise, or manage five or more persons in a “continuing series of violations” of the federal narcotics laws. Edmonds argues that the district court erred in failing to instruct the jurors that, in order to convict, they must agree unanimously on which violations — of the eight alleged — constituted the three related violations necessary to establish a “continuing series.”

In United…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Robert Dale Murr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. Jermyn v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API