Legal Opinion

Tankersley v. Castanien

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1916No. 6800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Creek County; Warren H. Brown. Judge. Action by P. M. Castanien and another against Dan Tankersley and others begun in justice court and appealed to county court. There was a judgment there for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On December 6, 1913, in a justice of the peace court of Creek county, P. M. Castanien and M. J. Skinner, defendants in error, sued Dan Tankersley, Alice Tankersley, and W. A. Tankersley, plaintiffs in error, under the forcible entry and de-tainer' statute, to recover possession of a certain residence .property in the city of Sa-pulpa. The petition substantially states that plaintiffs are tlie owners of said premises; that defendants made lawful entry thereon, but now hold said premises unlawfully and forcibly, and have continued to detain same since the 2d day of December, 1913 ; that said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Smith v. TravelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Stuller v. SparksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Burns v. NoellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bower-Venus Grain Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Bonewitz v. Home Owners Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Fast v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API