Burns v. Noell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Kay County; before Bay-ard T. Hainer, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE FACTS. This is an action for unlawful and forcible detainer brought by Noell against Burns; judgment for Noell, and Burns brings the case here by petition in .error for review. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauchamp, J:
William Burns, plaintiff in error, and Charles P. Noell, defendant in error, were contestants for the southeast quarter of section 22, township 28, range three east in Kay county. The contest was prosecuted through all the departments of the land department, and the land finally awarded to Noell, and he was permitted to file homestead entry thereon.
Thereupon this action was instituted by Noell before a justice of the peace in Kay county; judgment for Noell was rendered, and Burns appealed to the district court, where,' upon trial and upon the conclusion of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cope v. BradenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Durfee House Furnishing Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Baraboo National Bank v. CorcoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Tankersley v. CastanienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916