Hartwell v. State Ex Rel. Willis
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This appeal involves the validity of the Sea Wall and Roads Act or the Road and Sea Wall Act for Mobile County. Local Acts 1931, p. 203. There was division among the justices upon the original hearing as to whether or not the act contained two subjects as forbidden by section 45 of the Constitution. There is now a sharp difference upon rehearing as to whether or not the notice given by publication complies with section 106 of the Constitution, but as the court is in accord that the act is repugnant to other constitutional provisions, we hereby pretermit a discussion of the aforementioned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Oklahoma Operating Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Swindle v. State Ex Rel. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Ex Parte WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ex parte TsimpidesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Stone v. State Ex Rel. WebbAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.