Legal Opinion

Scott v. United States

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided May 21, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00629Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CRAIG SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:18-CV-00629-NJR UNITED STATES and PROTESTANT MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39) filed by Defendant United States, a Motion to Transfer (Doc. 33) filed by Defendant United States (the “Government”), and a Motion to Consolidate Cases (Doc. 43) filed by Plaintiff Craig Scott (“Scott”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API