O'Brien v. Hamilton
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs O’Brien and Holmes each own a separate parcel of land in Kingston near Brook Street, a public way. Hamilton owns a sand and gravel pit on about nineteen acres of back land, which has no bound directly upon a public way. One access to the sand pit is by a “wood road” about 2,500 feet long, which runs south through the O’Brien parcel (about seven acres) and the Holmes parcel (about twenty-eight acres) and through other land. Another access to the sand pit runs south from the sand pit through other land “over . . . more difficult terrain” to a different public way.
The northerly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glenn v. PooleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Lawless v. TrumbullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Town of Kingston v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carmel v. BaillargeonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Cannata v. Berkshire Natural Resources Council, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Robertson v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984