Legal Opinion

Town of Kingston v. Hamilton

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 13, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

The plaintiff brought this bill in equity to restrain the defendant from removing earth from an 18.6-acre parcel of land owned by the defendant, claiming that such removal was in violation of the town’s zoning by-law and of its earth removal by-law adopted pursuant to G. L. c. 40, § 21 (17) (as amended through St. 1967, c. 870). After a trial, which included a view, the judge made detailed findings and rulings, and, pursuant to his *774order, a final decree was entered which determined (1) that the defendant’s use of his entire parcel for the removal of earth materials, loam, sand, gravel, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. Town of East BridgewaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Byrne v. Town of MiddleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Kelleher v. Board of Selectmen of PembrokeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. Board of Selectmen of AshbyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. O'Brien v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Board of Selectmen v. JarvinenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API