McKinney v. Sargent
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, J., pro tem.
Action to recover the sum of $1,050 paid under an executory contract of sale of personal property.
The case was twice heard in the court below. The first judgment was in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $487.45. A new trial was granted and judgment then went in favor of defendants, respondents herein. This appeal is from the latter judgment and it is taken upon the judgment-roll alone. It appears therefrom that on July 6, 1927, defendants were the owners of the business known as the Latz Hotel, in the city of Modesto, together with the furniture and other personal property…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kirtley v. PerhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Hull v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- Bowles v. JungDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Modesto Dry Yard, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Brown v. HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.