Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Sargent

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1932No. Docket No. Sac. 4555PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, J., pro tem.

Action to recover the sum of $1,050 paid under an executory contract of sale of personal property.

The case was twice heard in the court below. The first judgment was in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $487.45. A new trial was granted and judgment then went in favor of defendants, respondents herein. This appeal is from the latter judgment and it is taken upon the judgment-roll alone. It appears therefrom that on July 6, 1927, defendants were the owners of the business known as the Latz Hotel, in the city of Modesto, together with the furniture and other personal property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirtley v. PerhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hull v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
  3. Bowles v. JungDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  4. Modesto Dry Yard, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  5. Brown v. HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API