Savage v. Neal
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
The hill was filed by taxpayers of the city of Knoxville to recover from defendants, former city commissioners and their sureties, on their official bonds, for failure to create and pay over to sinking fund commissioners annually tax funds in an amount sufficient to redeem outstanding bonds of the city at maturity, as they were required to do by charter provisions.
The language of the charter upon which liability is predicated is as follows:
“Be it further enacted, that any failure upon the part of the said board of commissioners to create, appropriate, and set apart the sinking fund annually,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Plyley v. AllisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Lowell v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Richmond v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- State v. KimballSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
- Ezell v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.