Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 28, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*849Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 7, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a security officer at a bank from January 2003 until his resignation in May 2004. Upon being informed that his two-year-old son was ill, claimant resigned from his employment with the intention of traveling to the Philippines to bring back his son, who was being cared for by relatives there. Claimant’s subsequent application for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of Jing Ying ZengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of UemuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of MunozAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of KuhnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WarmsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of SolerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API