Legal Opinion
Goad v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 5, 1987No. Civ. A. H-86-3432PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. 1 This Court heard oral argument on that motion on April 13, 1987. Having considered the motion, the submissions of the parties, the argument of Plaintiff and of counsel for Defendant, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s motion should be granted and this action should be dismissed.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 1980, after thirty years of marriage, Plaintiff Roland Lee Goad and his wife,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edward M. Farguson v. Mbank Houston, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaminetzky v. Frost Nat. Bank of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Goad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Fern v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Kaminetzky v. Frost National Bank of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Goad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.