Legal Opinion
Romanny v. Stanley Baldino Construction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 5, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
STEIN, J.
This appeal presents a challenge to the determination of the Division of Workers Compensation that New Jersey Re-Insurance Co. (Re-Insurance) must provide workers’ compensation coverage for injuries sustained by an employee of Stanley Baldino Construction Co. (Baldino). The employee, Gino Romanny (Romanny), was injured after the expiration of Baldino’s initial policy but before the effective date of Baldino’s renewal policy. The parties submitted conflicting affidavits to the workers’ compensation judge concerning the timeliness of Baldino’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lopez v. Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Miller v. ReisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Barbara Corp. v. BOB MANEELY INS. AGENCY & STOCKWELL-KNIGHT CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Cervone v. NJ Auto. Full Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Bright v. T & W SUFFOLK, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mendoza v. Monmouth Recycling Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Munoz v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Sroczynski v. MilekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Piermount Iron Works, Inc. v. EVANSTON INS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- ESMAY PARCHMENT VS. CITY OF EAST ORANGE(L-182-12, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.