Legal Opinion

Bowles v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1941No. 8 Div. 104Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, Justice.

The action challenged by the certiorari to the Court oí Appeals is the sufficiency of the judgment from which appeal was taken.

The judgment entry recites the appearance in court of the defendant in his own proper person and by attorney, and being ■“duly and legally arraigned in open court upon said charge for his plea thereto pleads and says that he is not guilty in manner and form as charged in the affidavit.” The issue being joined upon the defendant’s plea ■of not guilty, a jury found the defendant “guilty” and his fine was assessed at $200. It was thereupon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Schwab v. BerggrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Estes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API