Legal Opinion

Estes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1922No. 6 Div. 970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

It is first insisted by appellant that the judgment rendered by the court is either void or voidable; the same not being based on the verdict of a jury. Upon reference to the judgment entry we find the following as a part thereof:

“Thereupon came a jury of good and lawful men, to wit, Ed Kretzsehmer and 11 others, who, being impaneled and sworn according to law) upon their oaths do say, We, the jury, find the defendant Parrish Gray not guilty. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that he is not guilty. It is therefore ordered by the court that he be and is hereby discharged. .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Segars v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Mills v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Cranford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Ledbetter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Gilbert v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API