Legal Opinion

Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1923No. 17952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The respondent suffered an injury to his hand while employed as a brakeman by the appellant, in appellant’s yards, where the respondent had for years been employed and with the conditions of which he was familiar. The jury found that negligence caused the misfortune. The complaint and bill of particulars set up six grounds of negligence, as follows: (1) improper system of switching, on account of the absence of a cross-over at the east end of the yard, and no direct signal communication between the head and rear ends of the train; (2) insufficient number of brakemen; (3) that the trainmen…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Seattle Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lucchesi v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Henry v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hobbs v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jablinsky v. Continental Pacific Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API