Legal Opinion

Jablinsky v. Continental Pacific Lines, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1961No. 35378PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This seems to be a case of first impression, dealing with liability by a contract carrier for injuries sustained by a United States mail clerk in the operation of a highway post office, commonly called a “Hi-Po.” (We shall use that appellation throughout the opinion.)

Each “Hi-Po” is built to the specifications of the United States Post Office Department and resembles a large bus. The one involved in this case was thirty-five feet in length, ninety inches in interior width, and in excess of seventy inches from floor to ceiling. Midway of the bus are doors directly opposite each other; the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adkisson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Martin v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Hoskins v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Miller v. StatonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Travelers Insurance Companies v. North Seattle ChristianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Cruz v. HundleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Sheir v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API