Legal Opinion

Jones v. . Rhea

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Civil actios tried before Norwood, J., and a jury at August Term, 1897, of Buscombe Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Faikcloth, C. J.:

Plaintiff sues to recover the amount due on three promissory notes of defendant. The notes read as follows:

‘ ‘ Twelve months after date, with interest from date, at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum, I promise to pay W. W. Jones, or order, the sum of six hundred dollars for services rendered me as attorney in the settlement of the estate of H. K. Rhea, deceased. Witness my hand and seal the 13th day of November, 1893.

H. E. Rhea. [Seal].”

The defendant admits the execution of these notes, and avers that she gave the notes “with the understanding and agreement that he would…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moffitt v. . ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Nissen v. Genesee Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Sherrill v. . HaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Manning v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  5. Taylor v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Greene v. OwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Palmer v. . LowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Audit Company v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Nissen v. . Mining CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. State Ex Rel. Greene v. OwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API