Legal Opinion
State v. Strong
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1976No. File 11585PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLER, Justice.
This appeal was taken from a conviction of the crime of distributing marijuana contrary to the provisions of SDCL 39-17-88. We affirm.
Appellant was charged with having sold, on or about May 10, 1973, approximately five pounds of marijuana to an undercover agent, one Naomi Church, also known as Cathy Clark. Appellant claims (1) that the statute under which he was charged was unconstitutional by reason of (a) a defective title to the act, (b) the unreasonable statutory classification of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, SDCL 39-17-57(7), and (c) the unlawful delegation of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GroomsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. VailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. MoschellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Jopling v. JoplingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.