Legal Opinion

Kinney v. House

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1942No. 6 Div. 94PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners seek mandamus to have the Probate Judge of Cullman County place their names upon the printed ballot for the election of November 3rd next as candidates of the Republican Party for the several offices for which they claim to have been nominated. It is first insisted that the Judge of Probate in so having the ballots printed acts in a ministerial capacity and is without authority to question the right of the petitioners in that respect. In Section 145 of Title 17, Code 1940, the Judge of Probate is to print the names of the candidates on the ballots but there is no provision that a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. McQueenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Walling v. LansdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Greenough Ex Rel. Kelley v. WhiteleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Jones v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Perloff v. EdingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Herndon v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Hadnott v. AmosDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API