Legal Opinion

Alterauge v. Christiansen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from "Wayne. Bell to quiet title. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The bill in this case sets forth that Ignatius J. Alterauge held a leasehold interest, renewable on the 1st day of July, 1859, and at the end of each five years thereafter, in lot 8, block 3, of the Brush farm, said lot being now designated as lot 1 of subdivision of lots 8, 9 and 10 in block 3, and that he was in possession thereof.

That he held an agreement for a parcel of land in "Wyandotte designated as lot 6, block 57, and lots 10,11 and 12 in block 106, and that the full purchase price thereof had not been paid.

That about the 27th of January, 1858, said Ignatius J. Alterauge died testate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hammontree v. LottMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Little v. LesiaMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Plott v. KittelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Whitehead & Kales Co. v. TaanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Provident Mutual Life Ins. v. Vinton Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Wells v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Lockwood v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API