Burton v. Etheridge
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Beid. May 3, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. When a ease is set for trial due diligence requires that the defendant, if he desires a continuance, be present either in person or by attorney on the call of the case; and it is not a good ground for a motion for new trial that an agent of the defendant, on the morning of the day set for the trial of the case, went to the home of the defendant to notify her to attend court, and, finding her in bed sick, was delayed in locating the family physician and getting an affidavit from him as to the condition of the defendant, and reached the court with the affidavit after the case had been tried.
2…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Glover v. DimmockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Phillips & Co. v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Sparks v. Ober & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Howell v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAnally v. Bank of AbbevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Diprima v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Smith v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919