Legal Opinion

Diprima v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1953No. 34853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. "In all applications for a new trial on other grounds not provided for in this Code, the presiding judge must exercise a sound legal discretion in granting or refusing the same according to the provisions of the common law and practice of the courts.” Code § 70-208. “Where, on account of a misunderstanding between attorneys and their *232client as to lees, the former had their names stricken from the docket as defending the case, and on the call thereof they declining to appear, there was no response for the defendant, and judgment went against him, it will not be set aside because he expected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drain Tile Machine Inc. v. McCannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Howell v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Burton v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newman v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Dunn v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API