Legal Opinion
In re Kelly
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtBbeweb, J.
We are prepared to decide the habeas corpus case that was submitted to us two days ago; and I may say both Judge Nelson and myself have given the matter the careful examination which the question demands, and we agree in the conclusion which I shall announce. The petition alleges that the petitioner was arrested on the thirty-first day of August, 1885, by virtue of proceedings Commenced before Mr. Spencer, a commissioner duly authorized; that ■testimony was heard before the commissioner, and the petitioner bound over; that the proceedings and the testimony were certified to the department at…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Robert Montgomery Hooker, Appellant-Petitioner v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, N.D. Of California, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In re GrinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1901
- President of the United States ex rel. Caputo v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Robert Montgomery Hooker, Appellant-Petitioner v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, N.D. Of California, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.