Legal Opinion

Robert Montgomery Hooker, Appellant-Petitioner v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, N.D. Of California, Appellee-Respondent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1978No. 76-3727PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

573 F.2d 1360

Robert Montgomery HOOKER, Appellant-Petitioner,

v.

Frank X. KLEIN, United States Marshal, N.D. of California,

Appellee-Respondent.

No. 76-3727.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

May 3, 1978.

1

Claudia A. Wilken, Asst. Federal Public Defender (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant-petitioner.

2

Murray R. Stein (argued), of U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee-respondent.

3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

4

Before CHAMBERS and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER*, District Judge.

KELLEHER, District Judge:

5

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Fernandez v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jose Munoz Santos v. Linda ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Jose Munoz Santos v. Linda ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API