Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific First Benefit, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 18, 2005No. 02 C 8678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Answers to Interrogatories, and Defendant Alex Or-phanou’s Motion to Stay or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order Sealing Discovery. On December 3, 2004, the court referred these matters to Magistrate Judge Brown. On February 10, 2005, Judge Brown issued a ruling directly from the bench granting Plaintiffs Motion and denying Defendant’s Motion. For the reasons stated below, the court finds that Magistrate Brown’s ruling was entirely consistent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific First Benefit, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. Garcia v. Garcia (In re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Webster Bank, N.A. v. Pierce & Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API