Legal Opinion

People v. Burton

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1956No. Docket Nos. 3-12PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The appeal in each of the 10 captioned cases involves the validity of a summary judgment against bondsmen upon undertaking of bail in a criminal case, which judgment was entered more than one year after the entry by the lower court of the declaration of forfeiture for failure of the defendant to appear. (Pen. Code, §§ 1278, 1305, 1306.)

With exceptions noted, the record in each case discloses the following actions:

1. Defendant was charged with a criminal offense in the municipal court, was taken into custody, and was released upon posting an undertaking of bail furnished (exception in case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Pickens v. CoffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Upham v. HoskingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. Stuyvesant InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. National Automobile & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. Resolute InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. Surety InsuranceAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API