Legal Opinion

In re Kimmick

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 21, 2013No. 2011-378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Petitioner William Kimmick appeals from a judgment of the superior court, civil division, denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Petitioner contends the trial court erred in: (1) granting his assigned PCR counsel’s motion to withdraw; and (2) rejecting petitioner’s claim that his trial attorney committed fundamental errors affecting the sentence. In addition, amicus *55curiae appointed by the Court to assist petitioner asserts that the Defender General’s post-conviction merit-review procedures violated petitioner’s due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rose v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. State v. KimmickSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. In re LabountySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. State v. Christopher SullivanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. In re KimmickSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re Reco JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API