Legal Opinion

In re Labounty

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 12, 2005No. 03-504PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Petitioner, Aime LaBounty, appeals a superior court judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief alleging that his convictions for aggravated sexual assault were caused by the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We affirm.

¶ 2. On January 31, 1996, petitioner was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault, each count involving a different minor victim. The victims in the case had attended a daycare center run by petitioner’s wife. In February 1995, one child, B.M., disclosed to her mother that petitioner had put his “pee-pee” in her mouth. B.M.’s mother…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. In Re DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. State v. LaBountySupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. In Re PlanteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. In Re BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. In re James BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  4. In re Edwin A. Towne, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  5. In re KimmickSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API