Legal Opinion

Read Corp. v. Powerscreen of America, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 24, 1998No. 96-11025-JLTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs in this patent infringement action seek a preliminary injunction barring Defendants from manufacturing or selling the accused device. The case has been before a Special Master since November 1997. 1 The Special Master, after holding two evidentiary hearings, found that Plaintiffs, who waited six years after discovering the infringement before bringing suit, would not be irreparably harmed by denial of the injunction. The Master issued a report recommending that this court deny the preliminary injunction. Over Plaintiffs’ objection, the court accepts the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plymouth Yongle Tape (Shanghai) Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API