Legal Opinion

Hanson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 13, 2012No. 5D11-3109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The evidence presented in this case was legally insufficient to establish that the *289pursuing officer had “agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle” as required by section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (2010). See Slack v. State, 30 So.3d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Gorsuch v. State, 797 So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

However, because the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for the lesser included offense set forth in section 316.1935(1) and the jury necessarily found that the elements of such lesser offense were proven, we remand, pursuant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gorsuch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Slack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Erskine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Sanner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barry Edward Ellis v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API