Legal Opinion

Sanner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 2011No. 4D09-2179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion fob Rehearing

2Per curiam

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Appellant challenges his conviction for fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer under section 316.1935(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), claiming that the state failed to prove an essential element of the crime, namely that a patrol vehicle in the chase had “agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle.... ” We agree that the state failed to put on proof of this statutory element, requiring reversal.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Gorsuch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Erskine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barry Edward Ellis v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Hanson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API